Considering information validation

We need to be cautious about the high risk of unreliable information. It might be a good idea to check sources, and I should confirm with the user if they want me to search. Since the user posted a statement, perhaps they're looking to discuss the reliability of a rumor. I could provide them a concise response, offering options like verifying claims, checking archives, or looking for official announcements. Asking what they want first can help guide me!Verifying information on rumors

I need to verify details, especially since the user wrote in Chinese; I should respond in the same language. It's vital to avoid making unfounded claims, so I plan to ask whether they want verification. I’ll offer to check online and provide typical signs of reliability. While protocols allow running a web search, it’s good to confirm with the user first. I can also propose possible outcomes but will steer clear of speculation. It's best to stick to official sources.Crafting a concise response

I want to create a helpful reply that acknowledges the user's concern about the transfer rumor. Since the post has been deleted, I should advise treating the information with caution. I can suggest where to check for more details and offer to verify the information right now. Additionally, I'll ask if they have any links or screenshots to help with the verification. Keeping this response brief is key to maintaining clarity for the user!