贝蒂斯被判点球的VAR录音公布:巴尔特拉一开始就抬起手臂(VAR音频公布贝蒂斯点球判罚:巴尔特拉一开始就举臂)
栏目:一号娱乐 发布时间:2026-01-23

Clarifying user request

The user's message is in Chinese, mentioning VAR audio related to a penalty against Betis, specifically about Bartra raising his arm. From this, it seems they might be referencing a sports news headline. There's no explicit request, so they could be looking for details, a summary, or even a video/audio link. Since I can't browse right now, I should clarify what they want by asking: "Do you need details, context, or analysis?" I could also provide a brief explanation of the handball rule.Keeping context clear

be

I want to establish that Bartra plays for Betis, as that seems relevant. I should avoid getting too specific, especially without browsing. Maybe this relates to a match between Real Madrid and Betis, or perhaps the Copa del Rey against Athletic. I can give a general explanation of the VAR handball criteria and what "抬起手臂" means, and I can offer to provide a transcript if the user shares a link. I’ll also ask if they want a translation or key points. Additionally, I remember that LaLiga launched "Open VAR" for audio clips to explain decisions.Structuring the response

I want to break this down into clear points:

First, I'll outline what happened according to the headline. Next, I’ll explain how it leads to a penalty under handball law. Then, I plan to detail the VAR process, including the on-field decision, the on-field review (OFR), and how the audio reveals important factors like the initial arm position. I should avoid adding details that aren't mentioned directly, such as deflection.

fying

I can also touch on potential outcomes, explaining that if the arm is close to the body or there’s a deflection from a short distance, it may not be a penalty. Finally, I’ll check if the user wants the full audio or context of the match and produce a concise explanation in Chinese.

看起来是一次手球判罚的“Open VAR”音频被公布:裁判组在回放里注意到“巴尔特拉一开始就抬起手臂”。按现行手球判罚原则,这点很关键:

quot

  • 关键标准:手/臂是否处于“非自然位置”、是否“扩大了身体面积”。不需要证明故意,只要手臂位置不合理并对阻挡来球有影响,就可能判点。
  • “一开始就抬起手臂”通常被视为非自然位置信号,尤其当手臂远离躯干、增大了覆盖面积时,VAR会建议维持/改判点球。
  • 可能不判的典型情形:手臂紧贴身体、或极短距离不可避免的反弹(且没有手臂外展);但音频强调的是先行抬臂,通常不属于豁免。

你更想要哪种信息?

  1. 这次VAR音频的要点摘录/翻译
  2. 手球判罚规则的简明对照图解
  3. 当场比赛背景与判罚流程回放
  4. 我的中立判罚评估(基于规则与描述)